NEW DELHI: The Supreme Courtroom on Monday refused to entertain a PIL looking for re-writing of the historical past of Taj Mahal, saying, ‘All the pieces can’t be reopened after 400 years’.
It additionally tried to curb submitting of frivolous PILs by imposing Rs 1 lakh value on a petitioner looking for a declaration that Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra be declared as the one God for all Indians.
A bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar informed petitioner UN Dalai that each citizen has the constitutional proper to profess a faith of his alternative.
“India is a secular nation and the petitioner can’t be permitted to plead that residents of India might settle for Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra as ‘paramatma’,” it mentioned.‘Taj Mahal has been there for 400 years, let it’s’”This isn’t a PIL however publicity curiosity litigation,” the bench mentioned and dismissed it with a price of Rs 1 lakh for losing judicial time with frivolous plea.A bit later, advocate Barun Kumar Sinha argued on behalf of PIL petitioner Dr Sachchida Nand Pandey, who sought a course to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to completely look at the Taj Mahal and decide which construction pre-existed the Mughal-era monument.
Sinha argued that the distorted image projected in textbooks must be corrected after ASI offers its report on Taj Mahal.
The bench mentioned, “PILs are usually not meant for fishing inquiries.
Taj Mahal has been there for 400 years and let it’s there.
You make a illustration to the ASI and allow them to determine.
Don’t drag courts into the whole lot.
All the pieces can’t be reopened after 400 years.
The courts haven’t any experience in archaeology.”Watch Supreme Courtroom: ‘Taj Mahal has been there for 400 years, let it’s’.
Comment here